data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4a7a4/4a7a4119bdc4964d603ceef27677aa2e4d799e71" alt="top"
Stackelberg Assumption vs. Nash Assumption in Partially Cooperative Games
Year: 2012 Volume: 6 Issue: 1 Pages: 5-13
Abstract: We deal with n-person normal form games where a subset of players decide to cooperate (signatories) and choose strategies by maximizing the aggregate welfare of the coalition members as in International Environmental Agreements (IEA) context. The non-cooperating (non-signatories) players choose their strategies as a Nash equilibrium. In this paper the partial cooperative equilibrium (PCE) under the Nash-Cournot and the Stackelberg assumptions are considered and presented also in the case of non-signatories multiple decision. Some properties are discussed in both situations, particularly the profit of the players are compared.
JEL classification: C72, C79
Keywords: Partial cooperation, Stackelberg assumption, Nash-Cournot assumption, Stackelberg leader’s value
RePEc: http://ideas.repec.org/a/fau/aucocz/au2012_005.html
![]() | ![]() ![]() |
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/f5d88/f5d8841e7e651bb263428afc7a76b119b88532ac" alt="bottom"